> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.xquik.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# twscrape Alternative for Tweet Scraping | Tweet API

> Compare twscrape with Xquik for tweet scraping, follower exports, replies, profiles, timelines, monitors, signed webhooks, REST APIs, and MCP. See examples.

<blockquote className="agent-llms-directive">
  For the complete documentation index, see <a href="/llms.txt">llms.txt</a>.
</blockquote>

Use this guide to decide whether twscrape or Xquik is better for specific X tasks: search tweets, export followers, monitor accounts or keywords, publish actions, send webhooks, and connect apps or agents.

<Info>
  This is a factual comparison and migration guide. Verify current twscrape pricing, access rules, and product terms on the official site before buying.
</Info>

## Quick answer

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Choose twscrape when" icon="check">
    You want a Python library or CLI, can supply authorized X/Twitter accounts, and can maintain sessions, rate limits, storage, and exports yourself.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Choose Xquik when" icon="circle-check">
    You need tweet search, follower exports, write actions, 1-second monitors, signed webhooks, SDKs, or MCP from one product.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>

## Source-backed twscrape scope

twscrape's official GitHub README describes it as a Twitter GraphQL API implementation with SNScrape data models. Installation uses `pip install twscrape`, and development installs can point at the GitHub repository.

The README lists support for Search and GraphQL Twitter APIs, async/await functions that can run multiple scrapers in parallel, login flow with email verification, saved account sessions, raw Twitter API responses, SNScrape models, and automatic account switching for rate-limit smoothing.

The README says twscrape requires authorized X/Twitter accounts to work with the API. It documents adding accounts with cookies or login credentials, login and relogin CLI commands, account status inspection, account database selection, and optional manual email verification.

The usage examples cover search tabs for Top, Latest, and Media; tweet details; retweeters; tweet replies; user lookup by login or ID; following; followers; verified followers; subscriptions; user tweets; user replies; user media; list timelines; trends; raw responses; and converting Tweet/User models to dict or JSON.

The CLI docs cover search, tweet details, replies, retweeters, user lookup, user media, following, followers, verified followers, subscriptions, user timelines, trends, one-document-per-line stdout output, raw output, desired `limit`, and per-endpoint pagination behavior.

The README limitations say request limits reset every 15 minutes per endpoint, each account has separate limits by operation, `user_tweets` and `user_tweets_and_replies` can return about 3,200 tweets maximum, and rate limits may vary by account age and status.

## Comparison

| Area               | twscrape                                                                                                                                                                                  | Xquik                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| ------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| Use when           | Developers comfortable maintaining their own scraping code.                                                                                                                               | Teams that need tweet search, follower exports, write actions, 1-second monitors, signed webhooks, SDKs, and MCP together.                                                                       |
| Product type       | Open-source library.                                                                                                                                                                      | Platform for tweet search, follower exports, account actions, monitors, webhooks & files.                                                                                                        |
| Coverage           | twscrape README covers Search and GraphQL access, account sessions, raw or SNScrape-shaped responses, search/tweet/user/list/trend calls, and account switching for rate-limit smoothing. | 47 dashboard tools, 128 REST operations, 23 extraction tools, 17 X write actions, account and keyword monitors, webhooks, giveaway draws, Radar, 10 SDKs, MCP, and pay-per-use reads.            |
| Pricing & value    | The package is open source and can be free to install, but you own authorized account access, session upkeep, rate limits, output files, and job operations.                              | Xquik starts at USD 20/month with 140,000 included credits. Many read calls cost 1 credit per result or call. Top-ups cost USD 0.00015/credit, and webhook plus stored-event management is free. |
| Integration effort | Plan for Python setup, account pool setup, login or cookie handling, CLI output, pagination behavior, retries, storage, exports, alerts, and monitoring.                                  | Use a dashboard tool first, then call the same task through REST, webhook, SDK, export, or MCP when it needs automation.                                                                         |
| Summary            | twscrape is an open-source library for developers who want to build and maintain their own tweet, profile, follower, reply & timeline pipeline.                                           | Xquik gives teams hosted API keys, exports, monitoring, support, and billing.                                                                                                                    |
| Ownership          | Self-hosted library and maintenance burden.                                                                                                                                               | Hosted product with dashboard and API.                                                                                                                                                           |
| Operational work   | You own retries, storage, exports, and uptime.                                                                                                                                            | Xquik handles exports, uptime, and support.                                                                                                                                                      |
| Ownership fit      | Teams that want full code ownership.                                                                                                                                                      | Teams that want reliable hosted endpoints without building them first.                                                                                                                           |

## Operating model

Compare twscrape and Xquik by output, cost, and handoff. twscrape is an open-source library for developers who want to build and maintain their own tweet, profile, follower, reply & timeline pipeline. Xquik gives teams hosted API keys, exports, monitoring, support, and billing.

<CardGroup cols={3}>
  <Card title="Use when" icon="route">
    Ownership: Self-hosted library and maintenance burden. Xquik: Hosted product with dashboard and API.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Setup & API" icon="square-terminal">
    Operational work: You own retries, storage, exports, and uptime. Xquik: Xquik handles exports, uptime, and support.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Output" icon="download">
    Ownership fit: Teams that want full code ownership. Xquik: Teams that want reliable hosted endpoints without building them first.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>

## Xquik value to test

For API comparisons, price the whole task: endpoint access, pagination, retries, storage, exports, alerts, webhooks, SDKs, and maintenance. Choose Xquik when those pieces must ship together.

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Tweets, Followers & Exports" icon="download">
    23 extraction tools cover tweets, replies, quotes, reposts, likes, followers, following, verified followers, communities, lists, Spaces, articles, and search. Export results to CSV, JSON, XLSX, Markdown, or API responses.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Automation & writes" icon="workflow">
    17 X write actions cover tweets, media uploads, likes, retweets, follows, DMs, profile updates, and community actions from connected accounts.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Monitoring & delivery" icon="bell">
    Account and keyword monitors check active streams every 1 second. Events can be stored, polled, or delivered through signed webhooks.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Developer tools" icon="code-xml">
    128 REST operations, 10 SDKs, MCP, pay-per-use read endpoints, API keys, and transparent credit billing keep integration work small.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>

## What to verify in a trial

<Steps>
  <Step title="Run the real task">
    Use a real task: search a keyword, export followers, upload media, send a DM, monitor an account, or deliver a webhook. Compare outputs, not feature labels.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Inspect the output">
    Confirm returned data, pagination, retry behavior, webhook payloads, export formats, and API ergonomics. Then compare total cost for the same task: access, included volume, top-ups, and engineering time.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Check the next integration">
    Decide where the result goes next: CSV, JSON, webhook, SDK call, MCP tool, dashboard review, or another API.
  </Step>
</Steps>

## Migration path

Start with one API-backed task. Keep the current integration running while you compare output shape, latency, pagination, retries, exports, and alert delivery in Xquik.

Keep the test small: one task, one output, one cost model, and one downstream owner. Switch only when Xquik gives the same record quality with less glue code or lower cost.

Open-source software may be free to use, but operations, maintenance, and reliability remain your responsibility.

Price the real workload. On Xquik, Starter is USD 20/month with 140,000 credits. Top-ups are USD 0.00015/credit, webhook and stored-event management are free, and active monitors bill only while enabled.

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Xquik API overview" icon="book-open" href="/api-reference/overview">
    Review REST API authentication, endpoint groups, and response patterns.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Integration guide" icon="route" href="/guides/workflows">
    Map dashboard tools to REST calls, signed webhooks, exports, and MCP tools.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Pricing & billing" icon="credit-card" href="/guides/billing">
    Check included credits, top-ups, free operations, and active monitor billing.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Official twscrape site" icon="external-link" href="https://github.com/vladkens/twscrape">
    Verify current product details before making a final decision.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>