> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.xquik.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
# Xpoz alternative for X writes, monitors & webhooks
> Xquik beats Xpoz per useful result on X. Xpoz bills credits per search & per page, whatever returns. Xquik bills USD 0.00015 per row & adds writes & monitors.
For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt.
## Why Xquik wins over Xpoz
Xquik is the fastest X data service, & the cheapest per useful result. Public Apify benchmarks ran on 2026-09-27 & 2026-09-29. Xquik's X Tweet Scraper delivered 39.2 useful tweets per second, the fastest. It cost USD 0.000175 per useful tweet, the lowest of 12 Actors. Every run is public on the [benchmark page](https://xquik.com/en/trust#benchmark-x-tweet-scraper).
Xpoz publishes price comparisons, but no reproducible benchmark runs. Xquik publishes every benchmark run with its run ID.
Xquik bills only delivered, unique, filter-matching results. Empty pages, failed requests, retries, duplicates & filtered rows cost nothing. [Xpoz's pricing](https://www.xpoz.ai/pricing) bills 2 credits per X search & bills each later page too. At the Pro extra-credit rate, a search costs USD 0.006, even with 3 results. Those 3 results cost USD 0.00045 on Xquik. That makes Xquik the cheapest per useful result.
Xquik also covers more of X in 1 product. It offers 23 extraction tools, 18 write actions & 1-second monitors with signed webhooks. Agents connect through a remote MCP server, & developers use SDKs in 8 languages.
## Where Xpoz fits
Xpoz calls itself the social data API for AI agents. It covers Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok & Reddit. It bills credits per search, not per result.
This guide compares Xpoz and Xquik on specific X tasks. It covers tweet search, tracking, writes, webhooks, exports & agent connections.
Facts on this page come from Xpoz's official pages, read on 2026-10-15. Verify current pricing and terms on the official site before buying.
## Quick answer
Xquik is faster & cheaper per useful result. It also adds X writes, 1-second monitors, signed webhooks & XLSX exports.
You also need Instagram, TikTok or Reddit in the same API.
## Source-backed Xpoz scope
* A Twitter/X search costs 2 credits. It returns up to 300 results at no extra charge.
* Each tool call bills, including later pages of a paged result.
* Free gives 500 one-time credits. Pro costs USD 20 a month for 7,500 credits.
* Max costs USD 200 a month for 120,000 credits.
* Extra credits cost USD 0.003 each on Pro and USD 0.002 on Max. A search then costs USD 0.006 or USD 0.004.
* Tracked keywords & users make later searches more complete and fresher. Free has 1 slot, Pro 3 & Max 10.
* The hosted MCP server has 48 tools, 13 of them for Twitter/X. Every tool is read-only, except tracking tools.
* SDKs cover TypeScript & Python, plus a CLI. CSV exports reach 500K rows, metered against a row allowance.
* Authentication uses an access key, Google sign-in or a bearer token.
## Comparison
| Area | Xpoz | Xquik |
| - | - | - |
| Billing unit | 2 credits per Twitter/X search, up to 300 results. | 1 credit per returned row, USD 0.00015 with pay-as-you-go credits. Plans cost up to 20% less. |
| Searches | 2 credits per search, plus each later page, whatever returns. | USD 0.00015 per row with pay-as-you-go credits. |
| Empty search | 2 credits, however many results return. | Billed only for returned rows, so 0 rows cost nothing. |
| Write actions | MCP tools are read-only. | 18 write actions from connected accounts. Posting a tweet costs 30 credits. |
| Monitoring | Tracked keywords & users refresh data for later searches. | Account & keyword monitors check every second and send signed webhooks. Each costs 30 credits an hour. |
| Agent tooling | Hosted MCP server with 48 tools, using OAuth or a bearer key. | Remote MCP server with OAuth or API key. |
| SDKs | TypeScript & Python, plus a CLI. | TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Kotlin, PHP, Ruby & C#, plus a CLI & a Terraform provider. |
| Exports | CSV up to 500K rows, metered by a row allowance. | CSV, XLSX, JSON & Markdown exports. |
## What to test in Xquik
Count the searches & pages each job runs. Xpoz bills every search & page, & Xquik bills only the rows you keep. Small & empty searches show the gap fastest.
23 extraction tools cover tweets, replies, quotes, reposts, likes, followers, following, verified followers, communities, lists, Spaces, articles, and search. Export results to CSV, JSON, XLSX, Markdown, or API responses.
18 X write actions cover tweets, media uploads, likes, retweets, follows, DMs, profile updates, and community actions from connected accounts.
Account and keyword monitors check active streams every 1 second. Store events, poll them, or deliver them through signed webhooks.
Choose REST, an SDK, MCP, or pay-per-use reads. Credit records show each request's cost.
## Migration path
Run the same X query in both products. Compare results per search, fields, freshness & cost. Move the task once the systems that read the data accept Xquik's output.
Every action in credits and dollars, beside the X API's own rates.
Query parameters, filters, cursors, and response fields.
Verify current prices before making a final decision.
This documentation is built and hosted on [Mintlify](https://mintlify.com), a developer documentation platform.