Why Xquik wins over ScrapeCreators
Xquik is the fastest X data service, & the cheapest per useful result. Public Apify benchmarks ran on 2026-09-27 & 2026-09-29. Xquik’s X Tweet Scraper delivered 39.2 useful tweets per second, the fastest. It cost USD 0.000175 per useful tweet, the lowest of 12 Actors. Every run is public on the benchmark page. ScrapeCreators publishes Instagram benchmarks, but none for X. Xquik publishes every X benchmark run with its run ID. Xquik bills only delivered, unique, filter-matching results. Empty pages, failed requests, retries, duplicates & filtered rows cost nothing. ScrapeCreators’ pricing bills 1 credit per request, & empty search pages still cost a credit. On the Freelance pack, that is USD 0.00188 per page. An empty Xquik search costs 0, & each result costs USD 0.00015. That makes Xquik the cheapest per useful result. Xquik also covers more of X in 1 product. It offers 23 extraction tools, 18 write actions & 1-second monitors with signed webhooks. Agents connect through a remote MCP server, & developers use SDKs in 8 languages.Where ScrapeCreators fits
ScrapeCreators returns profiles, posts & comments from 20+ platforms through 1 API. Its Twitter API page lists 7 endpoints. Xquik adds X writes, monitors & file exports. This guide compares ScrapeCreators and Xquik on specific X tasks. It covers tweet search, lookups, writes, monitors & agent connections.Facts on this page come from ScrapeCreators’ official pages, read on 2026-10-15. Verify current pricing and terms on the official site before buying.
Quick answer
Pick Xquik
Xquik is faster & cheaper per useful result. It also adds native X search, writes, 1-second monitors & file exports.
When ScrapeCreators may fit
You need TikTok, Instagram or YouTube data next to X.
Source-backed ScrapeCreators scope
- The Twitter API page lists 7 endpoints. They cover search, profiles, user tweets, tweet details, transcripts & communities.
- Search finds posts through Google-indexed results, not native X search.
- The docs say recent posts can be missing from search. Google ranks the results, not recency.
- Each successful search page costs 1 credit, including empty results.
- User tweets returns about 100 of a user’s most popular tweets, not the latest.
- Most endpoints cost 1 credit per request. Cached results cost 0 credits.
- Freelance costs USD 47 for 25,000 credits, which is USD 0.00188 per request.
- Business costs USD 497 for 500,000 credits, which is USD 0.000994 per request. Credits never expire.
- No account-level rate or concurrency caps apply. The homepage suggests staying under 500 concurrent requests.
- Requests use an
x-api-keyheader. The hosted MCP server takes OAuth or that header.
Comparison
What to test in Xquik
Price the X part of the task. A ScrapeCreators request costs from USD 0.000994. An Xquik tweet or profile costs USD 0.00015. Check search results for recent posts in both products. Add writes, monitors & exports if the workflow needs them.Tweets, followers & exports
23 extraction tools cover tweets, replies, quotes, reposts, likes, followers, following, verified followers, communities, lists, Spaces, articles, and search. Export results to CSV, JSON, XLSX, Markdown, or API responses.
Automation & writes
18 X write actions cover tweets, media uploads, likes, retweets, follows, DMs, profile updates, and community actions from connected accounts.
Monitoring & delivery
Account and keyword monitors check active streams every 1 second. Store events, poll them, or deliver them through signed webhooks.
Developer tools
Choose REST, an SDK, MCP, or pay-per-use reads. Credit records show each request’s cost.
Migration path
Run the same X lookups in both products. Compare recent posts, fields, empty pages & cost. Move the task once the systems that read the data accept Xquik’s output.Xquik pricing
Every action in credits and dollars, beside the X API’s own rates.
Search tweets API
Query parameters, filters, cursors, and response fields.
Official ScrapeCreators pricing
Verify current prices before making a final decision.