CompareUse this guide to decide whether SocialCrawl or Xquik is better for specific X tasks: search tweets, export followers, monitor accounts or keywords, publish actions, send webhooks, and connect apps or agents.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.xquik.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
This is a factual comparison and migration guide. Verify current SocialCrawl pricing, access rules, and product terms on the official site before buying.
Quick answer
Choose SocialCrawl when
Your team needs a cross-network social data API, normalized response envelopes, computed fields, credit tiers, and agent packages.
Choose Xquik when
You want collection, exports, monitoring, account operations, API access, and webhook delivery in one maintained API and dashboard.
Source-backed SocialCrawl scope
SocialCrawl’s official docs describe it as a unified social media data API for developers and AI agents. Current public SocialCrawl surfaces use different coverage counts: the docs introduction says 21 platforms and 108 endpoints, while the pricing page says 27 platforms and 133 APIs. The docs introduction says responses use a consistent format across platforms and include computed fields such asengagement_rate, language, content_category, and estimated_reach.
Authentication docs say requests use the x-api-key header, missing or malformed credentials return 401 MISSING_API_KEY or 401 INVALID_API_KEY, and accounts can keep up to 5 active keys.
The credits page describes credit-based pay-as-you-go billing with a 50 concurrent request ceiling per credential. Standard requests cost 1 credit across 84 endpoints, Advanced requests cost 5 credits across 18 endpoints, and Premium requests cost 10 credits across 6 endpoints.
The response schema includes success, platform, endpoint, data, credits_used, credits_remaining, request_id, and cached. List endpoints return items, optional next_cursor, and optional total.
SocialCrawl docs say cache hits cost 0 credits, every response includes credits_remaining, GET /v1/credits/balance costs 0 credits, and idempotent replays deduct 0 new credits within a 24-hour TTL.
The pricing page lists Free with 400 one-time credits, Starter with 2,500 credits for GBP 15, Growth with 20,000 credits for GBP 49, Pro with 150,000 credits for GBP 299, and Enterprise with custom credits.
The AI agent docs publish /llms.txt, /llms-full.txt, OpenAPI JSON and YAML, plus per-platform llms files. The Twitter/X llms file lists profile, user tweets, tweet detail, community detail, community tweets, video transcript, and AI-powered X search endpoints.
The Skills & MCP docs list a socialcrawl-mcp package on npm and MCP Registry with 4 tools: socialcrawl_list_platforms, socialcrawl_list_endpoints, socialcrawl_request, and socialcrawl_get_docs.
Comparison
| Area | SocialCrawl | Xquik |
|---|---|---|
| Use when | Builders who need broad social data access across many networks. | Teams that need tweet search, follower exports, write actions, 1-second monitors, signed webhooks, SDKs, and MCP together. |
| Product type | Cross-network social data API with Skills and MCP packages. | X data, write, monitor, webhook, and export platform. |
| Coverage | Official surfaces currently list either 21 platforms with 108 endpoints or 27 platforms with 133 APIs; validate the platform list for the workload. | 47 dashboard tools, 120 REST operations, 23 extraction tools, 17 X write actions, account and keyword monitors, webhooks, giveaway draws, Radar, 10 SDKs, MCP, and pay-per-use reads. |
| Pricing & value | Credit packs range from Free 400 credits to Pro 150,000 credits for GBP 299, with request tiers at 1, 5, and 10 credits. | Xquik starts at USD 20/month with 140,000 included credits. Many read calls cost 1 credit per result or call. Top-ups cost USD 0.00015/credit, and webhook plus stored-event management is free. |
| Integration effort | Plan for x-api-key auth, normalized envelopes, credit headers, idempotent retries, optional cursors, agent packages, and X/Twitter endpoint coverage. | Use a dashboard tool first, then call the same task through REST, webhook, SDK, export, or MCP when it needs automation. |
| Summary | SocialCrawl fits cross-network social data collection when a unified envelope, computed fields, OpenAPI, llms files, Skills, and MCP matter. | Xquik is narrower but deeper for X tasks: account actions, follower exports, monitors, webhooks, SDKs, MCP, and dashboard tools. |
| Platform coverage | Multi-platform social data with current public count drift between docs and pricing pages. | X reads, write actions, extractions, and monitors. |
| Agent fit | Skills and MCP packages for broad social data collection. | MCP and REST API access for focused X data, write, and monitor tasks. |
| Scope | Cross-network profiles, posts, comments, search, transcripts, ad libraries, and computed fields. | X search, account monitors, giveaway draws, exports, and signed webhooks. |
Operating model
Compare SocialCrawl and Xquik by output, cost, and handoff. SocialCrawl fits cross-network social data collection when a unified envelope, computed fields, OpenAPI, llms files, Skills, and MCP matter. Xquik is narrower but deeper for X tasks: account actions, follower exports, monitors, webhooks, SDKs, MCP, and dashboard tools.Use when
Platform coverage: Multi-platform social data with current public count drift between docs and pricing pages. Xquik: X reads, write actions, extractions, and monitors.
Setup & API
Agent fit: Skills and MCP packages for broad social data collection. Xquik: MCP and REST API access for focused X data, write, and monitor tasks.
Output
Scope: Cross-network profiles, posts, comments, search, transcripts, ad libraries, and computed fields. Xquik: X search, account monitors, giveaway draws, exports, and signed webhooks.
Current cost checkpoint
Use SocialCrawl units when the job needs cross-network social data with normalized responses. Use Xquik units when the job is X-specific and needs search, follower exports, media upload, DMs, write actions, monitors, webhook events, SDKs, exports, or MCP.| Task | SocialCrawl unit to price | Xquik unit to price |
|---|---|---|
| Run broad social data collection | Confirm the needed platform on current docs because public counts differ between docs and pricing pages. | Use Xquik when the job is specifically X search, users, followers, media, DMs, posts, monitors, events, or exports. |
| Parse returned data | Responses use a consistent envelope with data, credits_used, credits_remaining, request_id, cached, and optional list cursors. | Xquik returns task-specific X API responses, extraction rows, export files, monitor events, and webhook payloads. |
| Price request volume | Standard, Advanced, and Premium requests cost 1, 5, and 10 credits, with 400 Free credits and paid packs from GBP 15 to GBP 299. | Many Xquik read calls cost 1 credit/result or call. Creating a tweet costs 10 credits/call, and active monitors cost 21 credits/hour while enabled. |
| Connect agents | SocialCrawl publishes OpenAPI, llms files, Skills, and a 4-tool MCP server for its social data API. | Xquik publishes OpenAPI, SDKs, MCP, workflow docs, signed webhooks, and exports for X-specific operations. |
| Search X or export followers | SocialCrawl’s Twitter/X llms file lists profile, user tweets, tweet details, communities, video transcripts, and AI-powered X search. | Xquik adds follower exports, tweet search exports, media upload, DMs, write actions, monitors, webhooks, SDKs, and MCP handoffs. |
Xquik value to test
For API comparisons, price the whole task: endpoint access, pagination, retries, storage, exports, alerts, webhooks, SDKs, and maintenance. Choose Xquik when those pieces must ship together.Data & exports
23 extraction tools cover tweets, replies, quotes, reposts, likes, followers, following, verified followers, communities, lists, Spaces, articles, and search. Export results to CSV, JSON, XLSX, Markdown, or API responses.
Automation & writes
17 X write actions cover tweets, media uploads, likes, retweets, follows, DMs, profile updates, and community actions from connected accounts.
Monitoring & delivery
Account and keyword monitors check active streams every 1 second. Events can be stored, polled, or delivered through signed webhooks.
Developer tools
120 REST operations, 10 SDKs, MCP, pay-per-use read endpoints, API keys, and transparent credit billing keep integration work small.
What to verify in a trial
Run the real task
Use a real task: search a keyword, export followers, upload media, send a DM, monitor an account, or deliver a webhook. Compare outputs, not feature labels.
Inspect the output
Confirm returned data, pagination, retry behavior, webhook payloads, export formats, and API ergonomics. Then compare total cost for the same task: access, included volume, top-ups, and engineering time.
Migration path
Run the same query in both products, then compare record completeness, deduplication, error states, and export shape. Move the task only after downstream consumers accept the Xquik output. Keep the test small: one task, one output, one cost model, and one downstream owner. Switch only when Xquik gives the same record quality with less glue code or lower cost. Compare SocialCrawl and Xquik by platform coverage, X endpoint depth, export formats, and agent tools. Price the real workload. On Xquik, Starter is USD 20/month with 140,000 credits. Top-ups are USD 0.00015/credit, webhook and stored-event management are free, and active monitors bill only while enabled.Xquik API overview
Review REST API authentication, endpoint groups, and response patterns.
Integration guide
Map dashboard tools to REST calls, signed webhooks, exports, and MCP tools.
Pricing & billing
Check included credits, top-ups, free operations, and active monitor billing.
Official SocialCrawl site
Verify current product details before making a final decision.