Skip to main content

​
Why Xquik wins over TwexAPI

Xquik is the fastest X data service, & the cheapest per useful result. Public Apify benchmarks ran on 2026-09-27 & 2026-09-29. Xquik’s X Tweet Scraper delivered 39.2 useful tweets per second, the fastest. It cost USD 0.000175 per useful tweet, the lowest of 12 Actors. Every run is public on the benchmark page. Xquik publishes reproducible benchmarks with run IDs. TwexAPI publishes none. Xquik bills only delivered, unique, filter-matching results. Empty pages, failed requests, retries, duplicates & filtered rows cost nothing. TwexAPI’s pricing bills about USD 0.00005 for a request that finds nothing. Every empty search or poll adds that charge. On Xquik, an empty search costs 0. That makes Xquik the cheapest per useful result. Xquik also covers more of X in 1 product. It offers 23 extraction tools, 18 write actions & 1-second monitors with signed webhooks. Agents connect through a remote MCP server, & developers use SDKs in 8 languages.

​
Where TwexAPI fits

TwexAPI is a third-party X scraper API with no-code web tools. It lists a low price per read item. Its writes need your own account’s cookie, and it doesn’t ship account monitors or event webhooks. This guide compares TwexAPI and Xquik on specific X tasks. It covers tweet search, follower exports, account monitors, publishing, webhooks, and agent connections.
Facts on this page come from TwexAPI’s official pages, read on 2026-10-15. Verify current pricing and terms on the official site before buying.

​
Quick answer

Pick Xquik

Xquik is faster & cheaper per useful result. It also adds 1-second monitors, signed webhooks, writes from connected accounts & exports.

When TwexAPI may fit

You only run scheduled REST reads & need no pushed events.

​
Source-backed TwexAPI scope

  • The pricing page lists reads at about USD 0.00005 per item and writes at about USD 0.00050 per write.
  • It lists requests with no results at about USD 0.00005 per request.
  • The docs say responses with 4xx or 5xx status codes are never deducted.
  • Writes act through your own X account.
  • The API overview says TwexAPI does not ship native account monitors, event webhooks, or async extraction jobs.
  • A hosted MCP server offers 2 tools, and SDKs cover TypeScript, Python, Go, and Java.

​
Comparison

​
What to test in Xquik

Price the whole task. Count empty requests, polling for new posts, write steps, and exports. Choose Xquik when the job needs events pushed to you, or connected accounts that act on X.

Tweets, followers & exports

23 extraction tools cover tweets, replies, quotes, reposts, likes, followers, following, verified followers, communities, lists, Spaces, articles, and search. Export results to CSV, JSON, XLSX, Markdown, or API responses.

Automation & writes

18 X write actions cover tweets, media uploads, likes, retweets, follows, DMs, profile updates, and community actions from connected accounts.

Monitoring & delivery

Account and keyword monitors check active streams every 1 second. Store events, poll them, or deliver them through signed webhooks.

Developer tools

Choose REST, an SDK, MCP, or pay-per-use reads. Credit records show each request’s cost.

​
Migration path

Run the same query in both products, then compare rows, empty requests, fields, and cost. Move the task only after the systems that read the data accept the Xquik output.

Xquik pricing

Every action in credits and dollars, beside the X API’s own rates.

Monitors API

Create account monitors and receive signed webhook events.

Official TwexAPI pricing

Verify current prices before making a final decision.